Where Does Thinking Happen?

An interactive map of human judgment and generative AI in academic writing

Academic work is not one task but a sequence of cognitive decisions. This map shows where human thinking is essential, where AI can assist, and where responsibility cannot be outsourced.
Click any stage. There is no single correct path.

Human Judgment Heavy
Shared Space
High AI Risk Zone

Dashed curved arrows indicate common points where the research process loops back

🧭 Pause & Reflect

Before moving on, consider your own relationship with these stages:

Which stage felt safest to give to AI?

What made it feel low-risk?

Which felt most dangerous?

What would be lost if you delegated it entirely?

Where did you disagree with this map?

What would you change about the categories or connections?

📚 For Class Discussion

Tools Used

  • Claude (Anthropic) — Conceptual framework development, content generation, code structure
  • Human (Research & Engagement Librarian) — Pedagogical design, course alignment, final editorial decisions

Process

1. Human Input: The librarian provided a course description, learning objectives, and initial concept for an interactive map exploring cognitive labor in academic writing.

2. AI Assistance: Claude generated the node structure, content for each stage, and the HTML/CSS/JavaScript implementation.

3. Human Refinement: The librarian reviewed all content for accuracy, pedagogical appropriateness, and alignment with course philosophy.

What Was Human-Driven

  • Pedagogical goals and learning outcomes
  • Decision to frame thinking as distributed across tasks, not binary human/AI
  • Choice to avoid prescriptive "right answers"
  • Final approval of all content and design choices

What AI Generated

  • Initial node descriptions and categorizations
  • Technical implementation (HTML/CSS/JavaScript)
  • Visual design suggestions and layout
  • Drafts of reflection questions and discussion prompts

Why This Transparency Matters

This page teaches critical thinking about AI collaboration by modeling it. Students see that meaningful work involves human judgment about goals, values, and context — even when AI handles technical execution.